ECDA – concept & members
In 2017, a cooperation of European law firms was initiated in the area of cartel damages claims,
which led to the foundation of the European Cartel Damage Alliance (ECDA) in August 2019,
a registered Association under German law seated in Berlin.
The cooperation of ECDA members is characterized by great mutual trust and is partly based on a long-standing exchange of experience and numerous joint projects between the participating law firms in the field of energy and antitrust law (see also AEEC).
ECDA serves the exchange of experience between its members and the formation of cross-border communities of parties harmed by a cartel / plaintiffs with the aim of increasing the negotiation mass, synergies in the processing of mandates and cost reduction, in particular in the case of assertion of claims or beneficial terms vis-à-vis the litigation funder.
The antitrust lawyers within the network have several years of experience in the field of enforcement of cartel damages claims, starting with the fire trucks cartel (representation of the municipal side), to the rail cartel (representation of public and private companies), specific energy cartels such as the GIS or the power transformers cartel (representation of network operators and industrial companies) and the trucks cartel (representation of the broad spectrum of truck buyers) and currently the high voltage power cables cartel.
Finally, ECDA members have established a cartel radar system, i.e. they observe European cartel proceedings from the investigations to the final (binding) decision in order to inform potentially harmed parties about current developments in due course.
ECDA - FORIS Competition Day
New developments in the field of private enforcement of competition law and litigation funding for companies in Europe
AGENDA coming soon
Grounds of the judgement by the German Federal Court of Justice in the trucks cartel case
On 7 January 2021, the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) finally published the long awaited grounds of its judgement of 23 September 2020 in the trucks cartel case. With this judgement the BGH has set aside the judgement by the court of appeal, namely the OLG Stuttgart, which had confirmed the first instance judgement awarding cartel damages to the claimant. The case was referred back to the court of appeal for a new decision. It is, however, important to note, that although the BGH criticized the OLG Stuttgart for having assumed a high probability of a damage a little too quickly, it also confirmed its reasoning in many aspects.
First of all, the BGH confirmed that the object of the truck cartel was not just an exchange of information, but also specific list price agreements and agreements on the transfer of costs for the EURO standard technologies. Secondly, the court affirmed, that the actual impact of the cartel is irrelevant for whether the truck buyers are affected by the cartel. And thirdly, the BGH agreed with the OLG Stuttgart, that also truck purchases in 2011 were affected by the cartel. Furthermore, the BGH confirmed that the statute of limitations was halted early on (i.e. since the Commission's raids in 2011). And finally, it stated, that increased purchase prices were not unlikely because the agreements related primarily to list prices. The assumption of a price effect of the agreements is according to the BGH also not ruled out by the damage appraisals submitted by the truck manufacturers and the damage was not eliminated by a pass-on of the costs to the clients of the claimant (a construction company).
Nevertheless, the BGH stressed, that the burden of proof regarding a damage remains with the claimant. The judge has to - based on a permissible presumption of damage - consider all circumstances of the individual case and cannot assume a high probability of a damage in an abstract way. Continuing competition and significant shifts in market shares may have to be taken into account in the overall assessment of possible price effects. Which impact they have on the result, however, is a question of the individual case, which the OLG must according to the BGH re-assess. By this the BGH disagreed rather with the way the court of appeal reached its decision than with the result of its decision making process. Ultimately, the decisions strengthens cartel victims seeking compensation in Germany, especially those damaged by the trucks cartel.
ECDA coordinator: Dr. Anna Lesinska-Adamson
Phone +49(0)30 611 28 40-10
European Cartel Damage Alliance e.V. (ECDA)
10179 Berlin / Germany